It's obviously way too early to do anything but guess where free agents will go next season. However, since the basketball world is curious, let's look at some of the big players, their situations, and take a stab at where they could end up.
LeBron James: Only three teams can really afford him, and none of them are remotely close to contending. In Cleveland, LeBron: has a shot at a ring; can make more money; is close to home (Akron is just down the road)--What else could he want or need? Plus with Shaq's contract expiring and Delonte West looking like he's trade bait, the Cavs have the financial flexibility to pick up a quality part or two. But LeBron is supposed to give all of this up to play for a joke franchise in New York because the bright lights of Times Square will help him become a "global icon?" Newsflash: Michael Jordan wasn't in New York. Neither was Shaq. Tiger Woods isn't. Lance Armstrong? Nope. Peyton Manning? No. David Beckham? Nah. Bill Gates? No. Warren Buffet? No--he's in Omaha, Nebraska. Oprah? Chicago. We can do this all day; you get the point. When you're the best in your field, the world comes to you. Verdict: LeBron re-signs with the Cavs.
Dwyane Wade: Unlike LeBron, Wade is really a free agent in every sense of the word. He has no ties to Miami whatsoever. The Heat only have Michael Beasley, Mario Chalmers and Daequan Cook under contract for next season, so they've got much work to do before even talking about contending. Aside from Pat Riley--who always knows what he's doing--there is absolutely nothing tying Wade down to his current situation. If the Bulls can get John Salmons to opt out of his deal, their cap room would jump to just over $18 million, at which point signing Wade, a Chicago native, would become possible. But in the end, the Heat have the front office skill and dedication, and the money to both sign him and add a major piece like Carlos Boozer or Chris Bosh. This is an easy decision. Verdict: Wade re-signs with the Heat.
Chris Bosh: Bryan Colangelo is one of the best front office executives in the league. He knows Bosh wants out and the Raptors are built for a one-and-done playoff run at best. He also knows the soon-to-be 26-year-old isn't a cornerstone player worth the money (Bosh is in his seventh season and has only sniffed the first round of the playoffs twice). Thus, we should all expect Bosh to be dealt as soon as possible. Possible trade destinations include: Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Houston, Miami, New York, Phoenix, and San Antonio. Verdict: Bosh goes to the Bulls.
Carlos Boozer: Boozer's time in Utah is up and the Jazz will deal him for something, rather than let him walk for free. Paul Millsap is ready to become the everyday starter and the only thing the Jazz really need is a dynamic scoring guard who can get his own shot and score at the end of games. Some names that make sense are Rip Hamilton, Vince Carter, Devin Harris, Josh Howard, Manu Ginobili, and Michael Redd. Boozer once said he would love to play in Florida (where he lives), however, with his divorce and the rumor his son gets special medical treatment in New Jersey (where Boozer is said to own a home), along with the Nets situation (biggest market, most cap space, plenty of young talent, lottery pick, billionaire owner, new stadium on the horizon) makes me think he's coming to the Northeast. Verdict: Boozer goes to the Nets.
Joe Johnson: He's in his prime (turns 29 in June), a quality big guard, and on a rising team that could contend for years. The Hawks can offer him more cash than anyone else. So why would he leave? He wouldn't. The real question is whether or not the Hawks want to pay him around $17.5 million per through the next five or six seasons. That's a huge commitment to a player who has never made an All-NBA team and has averaged 17-4-4 on 44% shooting for his career. Knowing he has Jamal Crawford--who can match Johnson's numbers with more minutes on the floor--sitting on the bench and set to make $10.1 million next year, GM Billy Knight will undoubtedly low-ball Johnson and shift his attention to acquiring a point guard and/or lost post scorer. Verdict: Johnson signs with the Knicks.
Amar'e Stoudemire: Even though he's technically not a free agent-to-be, the word is Stoudemire will opt out of his contract. The Suns shopped him around all summer but couldn't settle on the right deal (Cavaliers, Warriors, Wolves, Celtics and Blazers were all players). Golden State (Andris Biedrins, parts/picks), Portland (Travis Outlaw, parts/picks) and Houston (Tracy McGrady, picks) are intriguing destinations but do the Suns want to deal him within the conference? Miami and Chicago must be the frontrunners, and I'm sure Steve Kerr prefers Michael Beasley to Tyrus Thomas. Verdict: Stoudemire gets traded to Miami.
David Lee: If he were in their plans for the future, they would have locked him up last summer. Instead they refused to extend his deal and explored trades for him. Lee has to feel slighted. The only way Lee plays in a blue and orange jersey next season is if the Knicks start contract negotiations right now and offer him a deal he can't refuse. I think his chances of returning are slim to none, especially when you consider he might be the best value available in the league right now. Look at these figures:
(note: assumes next season's salary cap at $54 million. Career 36-minute-per stats used).
Lee definitely looks like the fourth-best option out of the bunch, but there's more to the story. These statistics include Lee's first three seasons, in which he came off the bench. Since becoming the everyday starter in 2008, Lee's per-36-minute averages are: 15.6 points and 11.7 rebounds. His per-36-minute averages this season are: 19 points and 11 rebounds.
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Lee's nearly 20-and-10 status is the fact he averages (including free throws) fewer than 18 shot attempts per game. Boozer and Stoudemire average 20. Bosh is around 27.
Look, I'm not saying Lee is better than these guys, but rather he's comparable when variables like age, durability, production and cost are considered. If you're a GM, do you spend, say, $60 million over five years for Lee, or $100 million over six for Boozer, Bosh or Stoudemire? $40 more million for five more points per game and a more marketable name? Needless to say, many teams will be interested in Lee's value. Verdict: (your guess is as good as mine--he could go anywhere from Miami to Portland).
For all the noise made about Lebron and Wade, this free agent class is more about guys like Lee, and to a lesser extent Travis Outlaw, Luis Scola and so on--players who represent the last important piece to the puzzle. Surely, people will ooh and aah when a name like Joe Johnson lands on the Knicks, but the true quality free agent moves will involve not the big names but rather the best fits for those teams on the cusp of winning it all. You wonder, "What if the Knicks get LeBron?" I wonder, "What if the Thunder get David Lee?"
We'll come back to this post throughout the season as more information and rumors materialize.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Thursday, December 3, 2009
2010 Free Agency Market Is Overhyped: Part I
And this, my friends, has been the message fed to you over and over again by reporters who either lack the ability to be anything other than stenographers, or are getting slipped some cash under the table to create hype. Why hype? Well, let's see--an NBA referee fixed games and recently wrote a book saying the practice was prevalent amongst league officials (and we all believe it). The league had to borrow $200 million to distribute bailout money to 12 needy teams. Oh yeah, there's also a lockout on the horizon (2011). Really, is it just a coincidence that for the first time in 20 years, a franchise (
The league is in transition and David Stern wants fans to believe everything is gravy, and there's a plan, the very same way the buffoons running the Knicks insist pissing seasons away is a step back to take two steps forward. And the media is in on it too. Just two weeks ago I heard Stephen A. Smith say on ESPN Radio's "Michael Kay Show" how he was 100% sure King James would be a Knick next year. I found it funny how Smith didn't offer up his reasoning and Kay didn't bother to ask any questions.
Anyhow, I'm going to share with you the real scoop on next summer's free agent class. We'll talk about who's available, where guys will end up, and exactly which teams are in a good position to improve for next season.
First, let's look at a list of the top names that could potentially be available:
-Joe Johnson
-Paul Pierce
-Ray Allen
-Tyson Chandler
-LeBron James
-Shaquille O'Neal
-Josh Howard
-Dirk Nowitzki
-Kenyon Martin
-Anthony Morrow
-
-Tracy McGrady
-Carl Landry
-Luis Scola
-Marcus Camby
-
-Jermaine O'Neal
-Dwyane Wade
-Michael Redd
-Rudy Gay
-David Lee
-Al Harrington
-Grant Hill
-A'mare Stoudemire
-Travis Outlaw
-Manu Ginobili
-Richard Jefferson
-Chris Bosh
-Carlos Boozer
-Allen Iverson
Looks impressive, right? Now, let's start to pare down the list, getting rid of each player who meets any of the following criteria:
1. Old, past his prime or broken down: Allen, Shaq, Ken. Martin, McGrady, Camby, J. O'Neal, Hill, Iverson.
2. Restricted free agent (current team can match any offer): Morrow, Landry, and Gay.
3. Team holds option to keep or release player: J. Howard and Landry (he's really not going anywhere).
4. Player is under contract but can opt out: Pierce,
5. Player is franchise iconic and will re-sign if and when his contract expires: Pierce, Nowitzki,
That cuts our list down to:
-Joe Johnson
-LeBron James
-Luis Scola
-Dwyane Wade
-David Lee
-Al Harrington
-Travis Outlaw
-Chris Bosh
-Carlos Boozer
This is what your amazing free agent class really looks like.
Now, ask yourself this very important question. How many of the players listed above are franchise-carrying, build-a-team-around, take-you-to-the-promised-land superstars? I count two: James (MVP) and Wade (Finals MVP). The rest vary from good to elite role players in comparison... sidekicks. And these sidekicks are going to be looking for max money--$100 million deals.
Which teams can actually afford to sign these guys? Here are the seven teams expected to have double-digit cap room for next season (in millions):
7.
6.
5:
4.
3.
2.
1.
Now, it doesn't take a mathematician to figure out that it is impossible for a team with $25 million in cap space to sign two $17-plus million-per-year players. The Nets, Knicks and Heat can sign one big-time player and then one, maybe two quality sidepieces. But no team is going to sign two of the above names. However, this is not what sportswriters are telling us. They keep selling us nonsense on how LeBron and Wade might play together when in fact it's not even possible.
So where will these free agents end up? We'll talk about that more in Part II.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
The All-Decade Team
TNT has announced it will reveal its "All-Decade Team" during All-Star Saturday night on February 13. In addition, a "Player of the Decade" will be named prior to the All-Star game, after TNT announcers present the nominees and fans vote. I know it's not even December yet, but I thought I'd use this as an opportunity to let you know my selections. Here they are, the 12 best players of the decade (minimum 400 games played) and their numbers during that period.
Center
Shaquille O'Neal: 23.1 points, 10.6 rebounds, 2.2 blocks, 59% shooting. MVP (2000). Four titles in five Finals appearances. Three Finals MVP awards (2000, 2001, 2002). All-NBA First Team seven times. Scoring title (2000). The most unstoppable force in basketball history.
Dwight Howard: 17.3 points, 12.5 rebounds, 2 blocks, 57%. One Finals appearance. All-NBA First Team twice. All-Defense First Team once. Defensive Player of the Year (2009). The most dominant center since Shaq; it's only a matter of time before the MVPs and titles start to roll in.
Power Forward
Tim Duncan: 21.4 points, 11.7 rebounds, 2.3 blocks, 50% shooting. Most blocks in decade. Two-time MVP (2002, 2003). Three titles in three Finals appearances. Two-time Finals MVP (2003, 2005). All-NBA First team six times. All-Defense First Team six times. The best all-around post player since Hakeem Olajuwon. My vote for the decade's best player.
Kevin Garnett: 21.6 points, 12.1 rebounds, 4.7 assists, 1.6 blocks, 50% shooting. Most rebounds in decade. MVP (2004). One title in one Finals appearance. All-NBA First team four times. All-Defense First Team eight times. Defensive Player of the Year (2008). Talented yet overrated player best recognized for giving 100% in every game he played. While he couldn't elevate his teammates in Minnesota, his defense and locker room leadership helped the Celtics win a title.
Dirk Nowitzki: 23.6 points, 8.9 rebounds, 47% shooting. Third-most points scored in decade. MVP (2007). One Finals appearance. All-NBA First Team four times. Incredible scorer and match-up nightmare who gets a bad rap for his team's first round loss to Golden State in 2007. People forget he dominated the 2006 playoffs (averaged 27 and 12 over 23 games) and almost won a title in what was a highly controversial Finals (Heat won three games by a combined six points).
Dirk Nowitzki: 23.6 points, 8.9 rebounds, 47% shooting. Third-most points scored in decade. MVP (2007). One Finals appearance. All-NBA First Team four times. Incredible scorer and match-up nightmare who gets a bad rap for his team's first round loss to Golden State in 2007. People forget he dominated the 2006 playoffs (averaged 27 and 12 over 23 games) and almost won a title in what was a highly controversial Finals (Heat won three games by a combined six points).
Small Forward
LeBron James: 27.5 points, 7 rebounds, 6.7 assists, 1.8 steals, 47% shooting. MVP (2009). One Finals appearance. All-NBA First Team three times. All-Defense First Team once. Scoring title (2008). The best player today.
Paul Pierce: 23.3 points, 6.3 rebounds, 4 assists, 1.5 steals, 44% shooting. Fourth-most points scored in decade. One title in one Finals appearance. Finals MVP (2008). In the greatest two-month period of his life, Pierce outplayed both LeBron James and Kobe Bryant, carried his team to a title, claimed to be the league's best player, and guaranteed himself a spot in the rafters amongst the all-time Celtics greats.
Shooting Guard
Paul Pierce: 23.3 points, 6.3 rebounds, 4 assists, 1.5 steals, 44% shooting. Fourth-most points scored in decade. One title in one Finals appearance. Finals MVP (2008). In the greatest two-month period of his life, Pierce outplayed both LeBron James and Kobe Bryant, carried his team to a title, claimed to be the league's best player, and guaranteed himself a spot in the rafters amongst the all-time Celtics greats.
Shooting Guard
Kobe Bryant: 28.2 points, 5.9 rebounds, 5.2 assists, 1.7 steals, 46% shooting. Most points scored in decade. MVP (2008). Three titles in five Finals appearances. Finals MVP (2009). All-NBA First team seven times. All-Defense First Team six times. Two scoring titles (2006, 2007). The decade's top scorer went from Wilt Chamberlain to Bill Russell overnight by "getting it" at just the right time in his career. Hate him or love him, he is the decade's best guard.
Allen Iverson: 28.1 points, 6.2 assists, 3.6 rebounds, 2.2 steals, 42% shooting. MVP (2001). Second-most points scored in decade. One Finals appearance. All-NBA First Team three times. Three scoring titles (2001, 2002, 2005). Many argue "The Answer" was more like "The Cancer" for most of his career. But there's no disputing his incredible talent and colorful personality entertained us immensely. When he was "on," you would actually stop and think for a moment, "this guy is the best ever." Few people have had that effect.
Dwyane Wade: 25.2 points, 4.9 rebounds, 6.7 assists, 1.8 steals, 48% shooting. Finals MVP (2006). All-NBA First Team once. Scoring title (2009). Wade barely qualifies for my list because he has missed so many games to injury, but he's without a doubt worthy. Tracy McGrady is in the same boat but I gave Wade the nod for three reasons: (1) he makes those around him better; (2) he's a strong defender; (3) he steps up in the playoffs (he practically won that 2006 title by himself).
Point Guard
Jason Kidd: 14 points, 7 rebounds, 9.2 assists, 2 steals, 40% shooting. Two Finals appearances. All-NBA First Team four times. All-Defense First Time three times. Decade ranks: Assists (1), steals (2), defensive rebounds (10). The numbers and accolades fall way short of describing Kidd's greatness. Only Bill Russell, Magic Johnson and Hakeem Olajuwon could do more with less. It's no surprise he's been in the playoffs 13 of the past 15 seasons and holds one of the highest win percentages in NBA history.
Steve Nash: 16.2 points, 9.1 assists, 49% shooting. Two-time MVP (2005, 2006). All-NBA First Team three times. Nash was virtually a nobody until he started playing Mike D'Antoni ball with the Phoenix Suns at the age of 30. Yes, he didn't deserve the MVP Awards. Yes, he doesn't play defense. Yes, he never sniffed the Finals. But he is one of the game's greatest shooters ever, and the league's best point guard from 2005 on. He averaged 17 points, 11 assists and 50/90/45 shooting averages from 2005-2009.
Honorable mention: McGrady, Chris Webber, Amare Stoudemire, Chauncey Billups, Tony Parker, Ben Wallace, Yao Ming, Vince Carter, Chris Paul, Ray Allen.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Knicks Talk Up Tracy McGrady to Keep Fans Interested
Just days after New York Knicks puppet master Donnie Walsh announced he wouldn't pursue Allen Iverson, Newsday's Alan Hahn is reporting "multiple sources" have said the Knicks are interested in getting disgruntled Houston Rockets star Tracy McGrady. What this really translates to is: "we mentioned McGrady to Newsday (also owned by Knicks' owner Cablevision) so a reporter could write about him and, in turn, show our fan base--most of which is still pissed we passed on Iverson--that we still have plans to improve." That's what that means.
Are the Knicks really interested in bringing McGrady on board? Sure. If the Rockets are willing to take Eddy Curry in return. Are the Rockets interested in dealing a huge expiring contract for Curry, who (a) can't play, (b) isn't needed (hello Luis Scola, Carl Landry, Chuck Hayes and Yao Ming) and (c) will be owed $11.3 million next season? No.
Unless a third team gets involved and a deal gets ridiculously intricate and complicated (e.g. eight players, including Al Harrington, and draft picks), there's almost no realistic chance the Knicks will land McGrady (making $23.2 million this season). In addition, he's coming off of major knee surgery and has missed 125 games the last four years due to injuries. Never mind the fact he never won a damn thing when 100% healthy. This doesn't exactly sound like a plan for improvement, does it?
McGrady to the Knicks? Nah. Knicks brainwashing fans into staying interested? Absolutely.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Perpetually Lost Knicks Organization Has No "Answer"
I want to say the New York Knicks are the worst-run franchise in sports right now, but a little voice in my head keeps reminding me how the Oakland Raiders gave JaMarcus Russell $31.5 million guaranteed to just yell hike, catch a snap and throw a football anywhere, randomly. That's truly hard to compete with--I'm 5-foot-9, going on 32, terribly out-of-shape, and I KNOW I can do better than Russell--but the Knicks are right up there with the most dazed and confused. They're definitely the worst basketball team in the NBA right now.
Sure, their 2-9 record isn't technically worse than the T-Wolves' 1-11 start or the Nets' 0-12. But the Wolves have eight players who have three or fewer years of pro experience. The Knicks? They have eight guys who have at least four years of experience or more. The Nets have already had eight players go on the IR, including three starters. The Knicks? Only Nate Robinson has missed time (six games thanks to a sprained ankle). Furthermore, anyone who has watched the Knicks this season can attest to the reality they look like a collection of guys off the street playing pick-up ball with little to no organization. This team is headed nowhere.
So why in the world pass on the opportunity to at least make this sinking ship entertaining to watch? Why say no to Allen Iverson, when you have the chance to throw him into the perfect situation, one in which he's a cheap rental and he's given 100% free reign to "do his thang?" Why?
I know Iverson is past his prime and comes with a lot of baggage (yes, he is the idiot who never "got it"). But his unpredictable nature and ability to make improbable shots as a little man surrounded by giants makes him so incredibly exciting. Give him his minutes, let him skip practice, and the man will give you more passion than Yanni's face could ever express. The Knicks don't even have a goddamn pulse; for better or worse, AI would give them life. At any other time in history, this would have been a bad move. But right now, signing him is the right move.
And Donnie Walsh said no? Why? Because Mike D'Antoni didn't want to deal with a potential hassle. Hassle? Iverson would be signed just for the rest of this season, for peanuts; if things don't work out, simply cut his ass immediately. But no, D'Antoni, who, let's face it, doesn't coach--he just throws a ball out on the court and watches--didn't even want to try to make it work. What's he getting paid $6 million a year to do again? I forget.
The Utah Jazz own the Knicks' lottery pick next summer so it's not like the Knicks are intentionally throwing the season with hopes of landing a top pick. I have no idea what this team is doing. One thing I do know is that Iverson would have been the perfect distraction, a really fun side bet that likely wouldn't have rescued the Knicks but certainly would have saved their fans from going through another miserable, pointless year.
Sure, their 2-9 record isn't technically worse than the T-Wolves' 1-11 start or the Nets' 0-12. But the Wolves have eight players who have three or fewer years of pro experience. The Knicks? They have eight guys who have at least four years of experience or more. The Nets have already had eight players go on the IR, including three starters. The Knicks? Only Nate Robinson has missed time (six games thanks to a sprained ankle). Furthermore, anyone who has watched the Knicks this season can attest to the reality they look like a collection of guys off the street playing pick-up ball with little to no organization. This team is headed nowhere.
So why in the world pass on the opportunity to at least make this sinking ship entertaining to watch? Why say no to Allen Iverson, when you have the chance to throw him into the perfect situation, one in which he's a cheap rental and he's given 100% free reign to "do his thang?" Why?
I know Iverson is past his prime and comes with a lot of baggage (yes, he is the idiot who never "got it"). But his unpredictable nature and ability to make improbable shots as a little man surrounded by giants makes him so incredibly exciting. Give him his minutes, let him skip practice, and the man will give you more passion than Yanni's face could ever express. The Knicks don't even have a goddamn pulse; for better or worse, AI would give them life. At any other time in history, this would have been a bad move. But right now, signing him is the right move.
And Donnie Walsh said no? Why? Because Mike D'Antoni didn't want to deal with a potential hassle. Hassle? Iverson would be signed just for the rest of this season, for peanuts; if things don't work out, simply cut his ass immediately. But no, D'Antoni, who, let's face it, doesn't coach--he just throws a ball out on the court and watches--didn't even want to try to make it work. What's he getting paid $6 million a year to do again? I forget.
The Utah Jazz own the Knicks' lottery pick next summer so it's not like the Knicks are intentionally throwing the season with hopes of landing a top pick. I have no idea what this team is doing. One thing I do know is that Iverson would have been the perfect distraction, a really fun side bet that likely wouldn't have rescued the Knicks but certainly would have saved their fans from going through another miserable, pointless year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)